ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Increasing demand factors in residential
by gfretwell - 03/28/24 12:43 AM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
Do we need grounding?
by NORCAL - 03/19/24 05:11 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
Cordless Tools: The Obvious Question
by renosteinke - 03/14/24 08:05 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (CoolWill), 250 guests, and 13 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#210145 05/29/13 11:28 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,233
H
Member
I have a question, You have an new in ground pool and a new pool cabana. Instead of running a 100 amp sub panel feeder to the cabana, they run it to the pool filter panel. Then they run a 60 amp feeder into the pool cabana. The Cabana has a sub panel with 7 breakers. The main breaker for the cabana is just outside in the pool filter panel. Does the cabana need a main breaker?

Most separate building services would say yes unless there is just 1 branch circuit. There is a main 2 pole 60 amp but instead of it being in the cabana, it is just outside in the pool filter panel.

Any thoughts? Is it safe? Does it meet code?

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,923
Likes: 32
G
Member
How far is the disconnect from the point of entry to the cabana?

Quote
The disconnecting means shall be installed either inside or outside of the building or structure served or where the conductors pass through the building or structure. The disconnecting means shall be at a readily accessible location nearest the point of entrance of the conductors.


Labeling may be an issue too.


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 7
Member
Harold:
IMHO, I do not see an issue. A breaker lock-out for the CB that feeds the cabana, proper marking, and as Greg said, close proximity.



John
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,233
H
Member
Greg, John,

The pool panel is just outside the back of the pool cabana. There is a storage area under the cabana where the sub panel for the cabana is located. A breaker lock would also service the purpose, however if you read the code, you are "Suppose" to have a main inside a separate building. This is another spot in the code, where you actually have to see the install in order to make the right call.

For the record, I think that most EC's would have run the feeder to the cabana, then out to the pool panel, not the other way around.

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 7
Member
Harold:

"This is another spot in the code, where you actually have to see the install in order to make the right call.

For the record, I think that most EC's would have run the feeder to the cabana, then out to the pool panel, not the other way around."

True words!!


John
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,233
H
Member
OK, lets change up the situation a little bit. If the panel in the cabana has under 6 breakers, the main can be outside. OK, However what if the cabana has more than 6 circuit breakers? Would you need a main now? (6 operating handle rule?)

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,233
H
Member
I just had another thought, What about a detached garage and a sub panel. It needs a main if it has more than 6 breakers in the panel, or does it always need a main breaker?

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,923
Likes: 32
G
Member
The NEC has looked at this differently over the years.
Originally there was the 6 handle rule, then they started talking about "lighting and appliance panelboards" and imposed a 2 breaker rule on them. In 2008 they removed that and we are back to 6 handles in most situations. You still need a main breaker (protected by an overcurrent protective device having a rating not greater than that of the panelboard) but 408.36 says it can be anywhere in the supply like the start of the feeder in the originating building.
At least that is how I read it


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,233
H
Member
So now if there is a panel in a garage and there are more than 6 handles, it would require a main breaker. Is that correct?

You know the code making panels are constantly changing rules back and forth, I think that they just want to justify there existent sometimes. smile

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 7
Member
Harold:
My take is as Greg stated above. The feeder requires OCP at the source.

A 'Main' may be installed within the subpanel, but it is not required. (A MLO panel is OK)


John
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5