ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
2 members (Scott35, sabrown), 149 guests, and 10 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#207697 11/20/12 06:27 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 745
E
Member
This restaurant that I do electrical maintenance for has become quite an obstacle course. It was built less than two years ago and I would have hoped that everything would be fairly easy. Not so much.

They have an outdoor bar area where they have multiple POS terminals (cash registers). When the place was built, they put in a really nice centralized UPS setup with a separate panel to feed dedicated circuits to each of these terminals (there are 24 of them). They all have (gasp) isolated ground receptacles.

The problem is that the ones outside are on standard IG receptacles with in-use covers. UPS or not, these receptacles obviously have to be GFI protected. For this reason, I've told them that they can't use the standard IG receptacles that were installed outside. Frankly, I don't know how this setup passed inspection anyway, but that's another subject.

I'd like to offer them a solution in order to legalize these outdoor receptacles. My thought was to just replace them with GFI receptacles and be done with it, but their rocket scientist IT manager at corporate has mandated that all POS terminals must be on IG receptacles. I've never seen an IG/GFI receptacle. When I was at the supply house today, I asked the counter guy about them and he looked at me as if I had three eyes.

Is there even such a thing? I suppose that I could change out the four breakers to GFI ones, but the panel is a bolt-in Cutler Hammer one. I can only imagine how much those breakers would cost. Any ideas?


---Ed---

"But the guy at Home Depot said it would work."
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,928
Likes: 34
G
Member
Put a dead front GFCI in the out building in front of the IG?

I agree the IT manager is living in the 70s. IBM lifted the IG recommendation in the 80s for "noise".
Done properly it might help with lightning mitigation tho but you would have to do it with that in mind and lay it out right.


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Tom Offline
Member
I haven't purchased an IG receptacle for so long that I can't remember. You should ask the IT guy if the isolated ground conductor needs to run to its own ground rod.

Maybe you should take a GFI receptacle to the jewelry store, have them engrave a small triangle on the face then fill it in with orange paint.

Or
http://www.legrand.us/passandseymour/gfci/isolated%20ground/2095ighgtrw.aspx#.UKwKTEZrmAY

Last edited by Tom; 11/20/12 08:55 PM. Reason: added link

Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 7
Member
Wow, HCF/HG/IG/GFI, by P&S....the $$$ should make the IT guys head shake!!

The 2 pole CB has got to be less cost.

Or, like Greg said, a dead front GF somewhere in the circuit.

Money no object...check out the Hubbel Spec grade version of the P&S. Slightly under $100 each in small lots.


John
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,928
Likes: 34
G
Member
John, the IG only means that the isolated grounding conductor does not land on anything else before it gets to the receptacle and it doesn't hit the box there.
On the line side it still gets connected to the service grounding system, typically on the bus par where the MBJ lands.

If I was doing this for lightning mitigation, I would land all the IGs on a bus bar, as close to the server as possible so it was acting as a bonding conductor between the server and all of the terminals. Then go back to the MBJ bar from there.

In my pool bar situation here, we actually fixed the lightning problem with a frame to frame bonding conductor from the remote POS terminal to the server, pulled as short as we could get it, with ferrites on the data cable, left long.
We lived with the "ground loop" guys and the "noise" guys all summer, until we pointed out the terminal did not get blown up once or twice a month like it was.


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 7
Member
Greg:
The way I read Eds OP is that he is concerned with the absence of GF, and the clients IT guys are 'hot' on the IG bandwagon (still).

As an Ec, and now as AHJ, I still have the debates about the IGs and the termination of the 'IG' as 'they' want it, and as it has to be for NEC compliance.


John
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,928
Likes: 34
G
Member
I saw a lot of strange stuff in the computer biz but I was a IAEI 2a, 2b, 2c at the same time that I was doing installation planning at IBM so I did try to be sure everything was compliant.

Even then the "official" description of the IG circuit had it landing on the ground electrode system of the service, usually in the service disconnect enclosure on the main grounding bus where the MBJ was.
I may still have the IBM physical planning manual around here somewhere.

You could always get a fight started with a "noise" guy about whether building steel was really a grounding electrode.
Occasionally I did find a guy who wanted a separate ground rod. I could usually make that idea go away using a current probe on a scope.


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,928
Likes: 34
G
Member
This is the diagram of the suggested computer room panel wiring.

[Linked Image from gfretwell.com]


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 7
Member
Greg:
Back many years, I remember a data room job with an IG. An insulated 'IG' terminal block within a subpanel, #4 'IG' to three rods at exterior of bldg. The 'IG' terminal block was a recycled neutral bar. THe branch circuits were 14/4 BX. The guy I worked for way back then was a real butcher.


John
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,928
Likes: 34
G
Member
Generally the IG was on neutral bar because they didn't extend the neutral to the computer room panel. All loads were L/L. The IG
The IG was basically the neutral conductor from the service or transformer, taped green instead of white.
That was where you had the fight about tagging building steel in the computer room panel.


Greg Fretwell
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5