ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 376 guests, and 7 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 764
K
Member
It would be a shame not to utilize that ufer. Would a one-shot Cadweld work for that #2 to #4 connection or are those only for rods. I know that Burndy makes the Hylink compression connectors that are listed for grounding, but I’m not sure if they make a #2 CU to #4 CU connector.

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

BigB #205252 02/07/12 07:05 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,273
T
Member
The inspector will never forgive you for your being right.

Overwhelmingly, inspectors only accept engineering handed down from higher authorities -- and a contractor is at the wrong end of the food chain.

------

There once was a general forman, a true genius, he was...

He made the mistake of trying to help out green foremen, green superintendents...

The latter NEVER forgave him.

At the end, EVERYONE involved was fired: both genius and greenhorns.

The super ran off the genius -- too much of an intellectual threat...

Then the super blew up the entire job -- running everything 'backwards'...

( He hadn't a CLUE as to where the priorities were. )

This caused ALL of the subs ( that's an astounding achievement ) to lose buckets of money and chronically fail their inspections.

After creating an 'instant legend' -- subs would discuss the horror for many months afterward all over the greater metropolitan area -- he had the guts to request job recommendations from the very contractors he burned for big money. (!)

------

Which is all to say: you can't afford to be right all the time; ESPECIALLY if you are. It drives the other guy crazy.

------

As for the case at hand...

Check to see if the #4 solid GEC is bonded to the re-bar above the grade. This is VERY commonly done. If so, expose it and switch conductors.

We're starting to see epoxy-coated re-bar. It would make for a useless GEC element. The Code is going to have to address this ASAP.

The Code, especially the Handbook, should have a Table of GEC Elements.

Within that table Ufers, Ground Rings, Ground Rods would be spelled out in crystal clear terms.

System elements that are required to be bonded in, if present, should be detailed.

The Grounding Path and the Elements that need to be Bonded to it so as to establish an Equipotential Plane can then be driven home.

And, lastly, some attempt can be made to clean up the difference between grounding and bonding.

( Grounding paths carry residual current ( +/- ) down into the Earth at all times. )

[ Bonding connections establish an equipotential plane for conducting elements -- with voltage potential flowing up and down -- normally, trivially -- with the bonded elements functioning in a Capacitive capacity -- NOT Conductive capacity. That is, they fill up with electro-potential and then bounce it back into the system - - just like a capacitor.]

The GEC into the earth, in contrast, bleeds electro-potential into the planet -- operating as a conductor for that purpose.



Tesla
BigB #205254 02/07/12 10:17 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 7
Member
In Teslas words...

"The inspector will never forgive you for your being right."

Some of us are human, and have been known to make mis-judgements, bad calls, incorrect fails, being late for dinner, and who knows what else.

Any contractor, foreman, journeyman, apprentice, helper, etc. is always welcome to talk, question, debate, etc.





John
BigB #205256 02/07/12 11:37 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,928
Likes: 34
G
Member
The Ufer is a required thing these days in Florida, at least around here. If you are using epoxy rebar they would have you dropping in a stick or two of uncoated for the electrode.


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 764
K
Member
As I understand it, through the research done during the development of CEE/Ufer systems, it was determined that conductors larger than #4CU had no verifiable effect on increased ability to clear fault current, so this would seem to indicate that increasing the size of the GEC to the ufer is basically just giving the inspector a warm fuzzy feeling with no actual benefit to anyone.

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 354
P
pdh Offline
Member
How to keep the steel from corroding given the chemical exposure and likely levels of electrical current during storms (they have those in Florida)? My guess would be that titanium nitride would work great since it bonds well to steel, resists corrosion well enough for medical implants (unless heated to 800C), and conducts electricity well enough for tiny electrical circuits (unless chilled to near absolute zero) despite being chemically a ceramic. Of course it is expensive.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titanium_nitride

BigB #205317 02/10/12 01:01 AM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,928
Likes: 34
G
Member
They allow the turned up rebar connection inside a wall with a cover over it in most jurisdictions here. That #4 copper pigtail had a bad habit of disappearing, either by job site damage or just theft.

This is a typical Ufer

[Linked Image from gfretwell.com]


Greg Fretwell
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5