|
0 registered (),
96
Guests and
1
Spider online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
#202857 - 08/31/11 06:06 AM
Xformer theory Q
|
Member
Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 5433
|
In a Y / Y (or star / star) Xformer setup, when given a nuetral on the H side, can it be a common connection on the X side?
I've looked in Satllcup/Ugly's/American handbook this a.m., no clarity
Looks like it's an SDS along with MBJ, GEC, , but why create a nuetral when given one?
Maybe i'm missin' the obvious & need more coffee?
~S~
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#202860 - 08/31/11 07:28 AM
Re: Xformer theory Q
[Re: sparky]
|
Member
Registered: 04/03/02
Posts: 4904
Loc: Brick, NJ USA
|
How about the possible voltage differentials btwn the primary (high) and secondary (low) when there is current flow present within the respectful system neutrals?
Sounds plausable, but I'm looking for more...coffee!
Just my first thought...
_________________________
John
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#202863 - 08/31/11 10:10 AM
Re: Xformer theory Q
[Re: HotLine1]
|
Member
Registered: 03/28/11
Posts: 98
Loc: San Diego
|
It is a common connection and a fault on one side can/will trip OC devices on the other, I have seen it happen.
Transformer manufacturers charge a premium to make one though and there is usually a phase shift, but I do not remember the details on that, though I'm sure someone will chime in.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#202864 - 08/31/11 10:31 AM
Re: Xformer theory Q
[Re: sparky]
|
Member
Registered: 07/20/04
Posts: 7146
Loc: Estero,Fl,usa
|
Maybe I misunderstand the question but aren't we talking about the grounded conductor on each side of the transformer? Don't you usually bond all the grounding conductors together? I am still on my first coffee too. 
_________________________
Greg Fretwell
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#202867 - 08/31/11 02:19 PM
Re: Xformer theory Q
[Re: gfretwell]
|
Member
Registered: 03/28/11
Posts: 98
Loc: San Diego
|
You do, but with a typical wye/delta, except for the ground the two sides are isolated from each other. With a wye/wye the neutral passes straight through.
If you're not using it on one side no big deal, but if you are then there are many issues to overcome or at least to be aware of.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#202869 - 08/31/11 03:40 PM
Re: Xformer theory Q
[Re: sparky]
|
Member
Registered: 06/16/04
Posts: 768
Loc: Sacramento, CA
|
Vindi...
Delta/Wye transforms cause a 30 degree phase shift... with the Wye lagging the Delta... It's in Ugly's -- the fine print.
BTW, Delta and Wye are TENSOR diagrams. So you can visually see the math by placing the star inside the delta and note that the star tensors bisect the delta's wedge -- each wedge is 60 degrees -- and cutting it in half gives you the 30 degrees lagging shift.
But enough Vector Algebra...
Wye/Wye transformers use more wire -- to no good purpose.
The windings ratio in a 480 to 208Y120 is 4:1...
This reality is beyond many electricians, I've been on the end of many flaming posts because of such belief. Some j-man think that the ratio is 480/208 -- which is entirely false. For those disputing this... open up a transformer and trace the connections. ( Turn it off, first. )
The delta connection is H1-H2 : 480 volts
The wye connection is L1-N : 120 volts
Wye-Wye transforms also permit noise from either side to crossfeed.
There are occasions where you'll find wye-wye: massive DC power supplies used to drive electro-chemistry: aluminum reduction, chlor-alkalai plants and such. They use a mix of delta-wye and wye-wye to phase shift -- creating 12 phase power from 3 phase. At that point the AC is rectified with a massive low pass filter -- thence to the reduction line.
Edited by Tesla (08/31/11 03:48 PM)
_________________________
Tesla
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#202872 - 08/31/11 04:11 PM
Re: Xformer theory Q
[Re: Tesla]
|
Member
Registered: 03/28/11
Posts: 98
Loc: San Diego
|
That's the big issue, the noise if you will.
This came up for me when using large step-up step-dn transformers on large scale PV projects, several 'other' engineers wanted to use a y/d-d/y configuration and it took forever to get across to them that there was no (easy/cheap) way to open a fault that way so they proposed a y/d-y/y configuration, which would work (noise was not an issue), but the additional cost and lead time was not worth it.
We standardized on a y/d-y/d configuration, but still wound up with one installation with a y/d-d/y configuration where we corner grounded the delta on the utility side of the run.
I still remember the jw and foreman calling me asking repeatedly, "this is going to work when I throw the switch right?" and the total surprise in their voice when they called back to say "damned if it doesn't work!".
Interestingly enough I discovered that a LOT of utilities use Wye/Wye transformers within their own distribution networks.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#202875 - 08/31/11 04:26 PM
Re: Xformer theory Q
[Re: sparky]
|
Member
Registered: 07/20/04
Posts: 7146
Loc: Estero,Fl,usa
|
Interestingly enough I discovered that a LOT of utilities use Wye/Wye transformers within their own distribution networks. FPL does it all the time.  The center tapped transformer in front of my house is fed from a wye. Pretty much the same issue with the neutral bonded on both sides.
_________________________
Greg Fretwell
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#202886 - 08/31/11 10:16 PM
Re: Xformer theory Q
[Re: sparky]
|
Member
Registered: 07/20/04
Posts: 7146
Loc: Estero,Fl,usa
|
Sorry about the big pictures but I want them to be easy to see. You can see the common grounded wire going up the pole here  This is the original 
_________________________
Greg Fretwell
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#202890 - 09/01/11 01:49 AM
Re: Xformer theory Q
[Re: sparky]
|
Broom Pusher and
Member
Registered: 10/19/00
Posts: 2562
Loc: Anaheim, CA. USA
|
Greg, No apologies necessary! I should have added more details. Larger Images are so much nicer than small Images! Small Images are too difficult to view, and are best used for Thumbnails!!!  The "2nd" Transformer setup (1st in the latest reply) looks to be a Wye-Wye, with MGCN. More specific, it appears as 12,470V Primary x 208Y/120 3 Phase 4 Wire Secondary. Apparent Power Rating = 75 KVA (3x 25 KVA) Per each 25 KVA "Pot" (Transformer): Primary Split-Coil 7200/12470V Windings setup in Parallel - for 7200 Volts, Secondary Split-Coil 120/240V Windings also setup in Parallel - for 120 Volts. (BTW, I have seen only a few Pots where the Center Tap Bushing is used for 120V 2 Wire output - normally the outer Bushings are used only). The "1st" Transformer Image looks like 7200V x 480Y/277V 3 Phase 4 Wire, Wye-Wye, rated for 150 KVA (3x 50 KVA). In the areas near me, nearly all Utility Transformer arrays have Delta Primaries (unless the Service is 1 Phase 3 Wire...  ...). LADWP had some Open Wye / Open Delta Setups. Saw these in the '70's and '80's. Wye - or more specific "Grounded" Primaries help stabilize Transient Surges (from Faults, Line Surges and Lightning Surges), help stabilize L-G Voltage (i.e.: Capacitive Coupling Effects) and help stabilize L-G Fault levels. In addition, Primary Coils have a much lower Voltage across them, which lessens the Flash-over issues between Primary and Secondary sides. As far as I know, MGCN Systems greatly outnumber Uni-Grounded Common Neutral Systems. -- Scott
_________________________
Scott " 35 " Thompson Just Say NO To Green Eggs And Ham!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#202891 - 09/01/11 02:04 AM
Re: Xformer theory Q
[Re: sparky]
|
Member
Registered: 07/20/04
Posts: 7146
Loc: Estero,Fl,usa
|
Distribution seems to be wye here pretty much everywhere and we have a lot of the 2 transformer "delta Vee" thing. I have a picture of one of those too if you like. (Mr Bill wants me to resize it before I post it)
We see a bunch of it in the "light industrial bay" type places.
_________________________
Greg Fretwell
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#202905 - 09/01/11 11:30 AM
Re: Xformer theory Q
[Re: Trumpy]
|
Member
Registered: 03/28/11
Posts: 98
Loc: San Diego
|
That's not too bad.
I was on a site walk for a military building two weeks ago that had 3 services (building was only 40k sq ft. One of the services was an 800a, 240v/3p high leg from pole mtd transformers. All three transformers were physically different sizes and A and B were 50kVA while C was 75kVA........
It should be noted that the building was originally an agricultural packing facility.
Edited by Vindiceptor (09/01/11 11:38 AM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#202906 - 09/01/11 01:44 PM
Re: Xformer theory Q
[Re: sparky]
|
Member
Registered: 07/20/04
Posts: 7146
Loc: Estero,Fl,usa
|
Trumpy, I think the PoCos like multiple transformers (of essentially the same type) that they can mix and match in several ways to create all of the strange service arrangements we have. The service truck does not need to carry many different types to fix almost anything. The 50 KVA unit is becoming the defacto standard around here. There are several ways to tap them and it has a voltage select switch to enhance that adaptability. http://gfretwell.com/electrical/Transformer%20connection%20label.jpg
_________________________
Greg Fretwell
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#202964 - 09/02/11 07:15 PM
Re: Xformer theory Q
[Re: gfretwell]
|
Member
Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 5433
|
Maybe I misunderstand the question but aren't we talking about the grounded conductor on each side of the transformer?
Don't you usually bond all the grounding conductors together? well, that's what i've been used to doing, but i've been confronted by what is either a demographic electrical standard (from the DC area) , or i've simply been doing it wrong for 2+ decades
so here's the deal>
(you'll please pardon the blue noodle, white or grey wouldn't show up) I'm used to floating the noodle through on smaller installs, typically 30-50KVA stuff for me
I'm told this isn't correct, and only the creation of a noodle flys Further, it just seems to me that, if we go the SDS / GEC route, it's not only more work, if it's done repetitively within any given steel structure , i'd been turning the whole place into one big noodleThis reality is beyond many electricians, raises hand.....
Edited by sparky (09/02/11 07:29 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#202965 - 09/02/11 07:33 PM
Re: Xformer theory Q
[Re: sparky]
|
Member
Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 5433
|
Gee, You guys over there make things so difficult for yourselves. procrastination is a national passtime here Trump..
~S~
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#202973 - 09/02/11 10:26 PM
Re: Xformer theory Q
[Re: sparky]
|
Member
Registered: 07/20/04
Posts: 7146
Loc: Estero,Fl,usa
|
If there is no neutral winding on the transformer (AKA wye connected), I wouldn't even bring the neutral there.
I like the bottom connection diagram. We just had this in another thread didn't we?
_________________________
Greg Fretwell
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#202975 - 09/03/11 06:35 AM
Re: Xformer theory Q
[Re: gfretwell]
|
Member
Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 5433
|
If there is no neutral winding on the transformer (AKA wye connected), I wouldn't even bring the neutral there. ]
I like the bottom connection diagram. ok, why Greg, and which would be compliant?We just had this in another thread didn't we? sorry if i missed it
~S~
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#202984 - 09/03/11 04:05 PM
Re: Xformer theory Q
[Re: gfretwell]
|
Member
Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 5433
|
Ok,thanx Greg, if there are no code and/or manufacturer's violations either way, i guess i need to ask for pro's and con's here
~S~
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#203088 - 09/07/11 07:40 PM
Re: Xformer theory Q
[Re: sparky]
|
Member
Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 5433
|
http://www.tristateindustrialgroup.com/sites/tristate/uploads/documents/Transformers.pdfwuz given the above in a continued effort to dislodge my cranim from my large intestine
of note is pg 14 >>>>>>>>> Y Y Closed / Neutral Prim Yes Sec Yes , which is what i believe i've been trying to describe. The following from it>YY Closed / Neutral Prim yes Sec-yes
The Primary Nuetral should be tied firmly to the system nuetral, otherwise exessive voltage may develop on the secondary side
If 3ph load is unbalanced, part of the load current flows in the primary neutral
The 3rd harmonic componet of the Xformer exciting current also flows in the primary neutral
For these reasons, it is necessary that the neutrals be tied together as shown
If this tie were omitted, the line to neutral voltages on the secondary would be very unstable
That is, if the load on one phase were heavier than on the other two, phases would rise
Also, large 3rd harmonic voltages would appear bettween lines and neutral, both in the xfomer, and in the secondary system, in addition to the 60HZ component of voltage.
This means that for a given value of RMS voltage, the peak voltage would be much higher than that for a pure 60Hz voltage
This overstreeses the insulation both in the Xformer and in all apparatus connected to the secondaries
Edited by sparky (09/07/11 07:54 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|