|
0 members (),
255
guests, and
16
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,273
Member
|
With such items as instant hot water heaters booming in the market place the industry needs to produce a reasonably priced disconnecting means.
I'd favor some wild variant of the A/C disconnect. You know... The one that is as simple as can be -- a variant of a fuse holder.
Tesla
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,233
Member
|
I think I posted a question about this problem before. I came across those instant hot water heaters that Tesla is talking about. In my case there was a sub panel right next to the heater and there was three 2 pole breakers for the unit. The EC marked the panel and the heater very clearly stating that there is more than 1 feed to the piece of equipment. Also the sub panel was in reach of the heater and all breaker were also marked.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,923 Likes: 32
Member
|
If you have a local sub panel, why not just get one with a main breaker and label it as the disconnect?
Greg Fretwell
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,233
Member
|
That is because the EC will have to buy a service panel with main breaker and the homeowner wants the job done for less! Or else the other EC will bid only a sub panel with 3 breakers instead of main panel and 4 breakers.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,923 Likes: 32
Member
|
I was thinking more like an 8 slot panel with a back fed main. They are not that expensive and we still need to have a code complying installation, no matter what.
Greg Fretwell
|
|
|
Tom
Shinnston, WV USA
Posts: 1,044
Joined: January 2001
|
|
|
|
|