The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!

Featured Items:

Switch Bit - Interchangeable Flex Bit System
>> Switch Bit -
Interchangeable Flex Bit System

>> 2014 NEC and Related

Recent Posts
Burnt meter leads testing receptacle voltage
by LarryC
Today at 04:27 PM
Markings required on Disconnects, OCD,ect
by HotLine1
Yesterday at 08:21 PM
Circuit Breaker temperature ratings and the CEC
by twh
08/23/14 11:55 PM
Panel fillers
by Potseal
08/23/14 04:33 PM
C of Q 442A Industrial Electrician Exam
by cyrus4255
08/23/14 02:21 PM
New in the Gallery:
Copper Theft
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
gfretwell 17
HotLine1 16
Potseal 8
Tesla 5
captzap 4
Who's Online
1 registered (gfretwell), 93 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#197369 - 11/23/10 01:14 PM Re: Table 310.15[B],16 [Re: gfretwell]
KJay Offline
Member

Registered: 11/27/07
Posts: 758
Loc: MA, USA
I just received my 2011 Handbook, so for those still waiting, I assume this means they are now available everywhere.
The change I was asking about above appears to be mostly just the Table numbering and some 60C and 90C ampacity changes.
It looks like they have reduced ampacity for some copper conductors at 60C by 5 Amps, but increased some other aluminum conductors by the same amount.

Top
2014 / 2011 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#197370 - 11/23/10 04:31 PM Re: Table 310.15[B],16 [Re: KJay]
HotLine1 Offline

Member

Registered: 04/03/02
Posts: 6220
Loc: Brick, NJ USA
Thanks Kjay!
I'm waiting for the CD & Handbook combo....
_________________________
John

Top
#197384 - 11/24/10 06:23 AM Re: Table 310.15[B],16 [Re: HotLine1]
harold endean Offline
Member

Registered: 02/16/02
Posts: 2244
Loc: Boonton, NJ
I haven't got any new books yet, Waiting to see what the best deal I can do, plus my state is very slow at adopting the new NEC after it is out.

Top
#197387 - 11/24/10 08:01 AM Re: Table 310.15[B],16 [Re: harold endean]
HotLine1 Offline

Member

Registered: 04/03/02
Posts: 6220
Loc: Brick, NJ USA
Harold:
I know what you mean about state adoption, but I get a 'new' NEC ASAP, and the changes ASAP to prepare my courses and for my 'absorbition' time.

My CO rejected the PO request for the '11 NEC for the office to conserve $$ based on 'we don't need it yet'.
_________________________
John

Top
#197432 - 11/29/10 06:12 AM Re: Table 310.15[B],16 [Re: HotLine1]
harold endean Offline
Member

Registered: 02/16/02
Posts: 2244
Loc: Boonton, NJ
John,

I work for 4 different towns and some of my towns would never buy me a code book. Last year was the first time (I believe) that I got code books for every town. They are all watching their money.

Top
#198840 - 02/05/11 04:40 PM Re: Table 310.15[B],16 [Re: gfretwell]
nercGerald Offline
Member

Registered: 02/05/11
Posts: 15
Loc: North Pole, Alaska
So Mike Holt put in the name change thing. 310.16 was pretty easy to remember and has been the same for the last 30 years. It was Table 310.12 in my 1971 Code. So now we have 310.15(B)(16) that is much more difficult to remember and say and write. I wonder when does usability become more important than the Style manual?


Edited by nercGerald (02/05/11 04:40 PM)

Top
#198846 - 02/05/11 06:23 PM Re: Table 310.15[B],16 [Re: KJay]
Tesla Offline
Member

Registered: 06/16/04
Posts: 1178
Loc: Sacramento, CA
It had to be changed if you think about it. When cited all and every know that the table referenced by 310.16 is different than 310.15 (B) 16.

Otherwise, in all correspondence the adjusted values are not apparent.
_________________________
Tesla

Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2



ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals