ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 19
Recent Posts
fuse rejectors
by NORCAL. 03/29/17 01:44 AM
Old decora style outlets
by NORCAL. 03/29/17 01:41 AM
NFPA stuff
by gfretwell. 03/28/17 08:08 PM
Anyone hiring inspectors?
by HotLine1. 03/27/17 08:03 AM
ESA Arc flash course
by TheShockDoctors. 03/24/17 10:15 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
231,713 Are you busy
166,612 Re: Forum
160,777 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 56 guests, and 10 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
#197369 - 11/23/10 05:14 PM Re: Table 310.15[B],16 [Re: gfretwell]  
KJay  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 763
MA, USA
I just received my 2011 Handbook, so for those still waiting, I assume this means they are now available everywhere.
The change I was asking about above appears to be mostly just the Table numbering and some 60C and 90C ampacity changes.
It looks like they have reduced ampacity for some copper conductors at 60C by 5 Amps, but increased some other aluminum conductors by the same amount.


2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#197370 - 11/23/10 08:31 PM Re: Table 310.15[B],16 [Re: KJay]  
HotLine1  Offline


Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,803
Brick, NJ USA
Thanks Kjay!
I'm waiting for the CD & Handbook combo....



John

#197384 - 11/24/10 10:23 AM Re: Table 310.15[B],16 [Re: HotLine1]  
harold endean  Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,233
Boonton, NJ
I haven't got any new books yet, Waiting to see what the best deal I can do, plus my state is very slow at adopting the new NEC after it is out.


#197387 - 11/24/10 12:01 PM Re: Table 310.15[B],16 [Re: harold endean]  
HotLine1  Offline


Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,803
Brick, NJ USA
Harold:
I know what you mean about state adoption, but I get a 'new' NEC ASAP, and the changes ASAP to prepare my courses and for my 'absorbition' time.

My CO rejected the PO request for the '11 NEC for the office to conserve $$ based on 'we don't need it yet'.


John

#197432 - 11/29/10 10:12 AM Re: Table 310.15[B],16 [Re: HotLine1]  
harold endean  Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,233
Boonton, NJ
John,

I work for 4 different towns and some of my towns would never buy me a code book. Last year was the first time (I believe) that I got code books for every town. They are all watching their money.


#198840 - 02/05/11 08:40 PM Re: Table 310.15[B],16 [Re: gfretwell]  
nercGerald  Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 15
North Pole, Alaska
So Mike Holt put in the name change thing. 310.16 was pretty easy to remember and has been the same for the last 30 years. It was Table 310.12 in my 1971 Code. So now we have 310.15(B)(16) that is much more difficult to remember and say and write. I wonder when does usability become more important than the Style manual?

Last edited by nercGerald; 02/05/11 08:40 PM.

#198846 - 02/05/11 10:23 PM Re: Table 310.15[B],16 [Re: KJay]  
Tesla  Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,273
Sacramento, CA
It had to be changed if you think about it. When cited all and every know that the table referenced by 310.16 is different than 310.15 (B) 16.

Otherwise, in all correspondence the adjusted values are not apparent.


Tesla

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Member Spotlight
dougwells
dougwells
kamloops BC Canada
Posts: 1,137
Joined: May 2003
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.015s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.7916 MB (Peak: 0.9478 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-29 09:17:19 UTC