ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 373 guests, and 12 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,507
G
Member
Greg and all- Just had an email with Don Iverson, the NEMA rep in our area and talked to Cutler Hammer and indeed they have an AFCI/GFCI breaker with a trip of 4-5 ma, that's the good news, the bad news is they only have it in the branch circuit variety and not in the combination variety that is required by code now.


George Little
Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 764
K
Member
So, I guess the next question is where would the branch feeder type AFCI’s be acceptable to use.
For replacement purposes?
If not, I can’t see any reason for them to even manufacture these anymore.

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,928
Likes: 34
G
Member
They may just be working off the existing stock while the new one is in the pipe. There may be "the next big thing" still working it's way through B test. The code really han't created the need yet. When kitchens and bathrooms go on AFCI, I bet these new ones will be out there.


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,445
Likes: 3
Cat Servant
Member
In days like these, it's hard to remember that one essential element of law is that folks be able to know, with certainty, just what the law is.

Forget the opposition to the AFCI; nothing has made the AFCI issue more confusing than the existance, within such a short time, of two distinct types of AFCI.

Compare this to the major upgrade there was a few years back on GFCI's. There was no code change; rather, the new ones were quietly introduced and the old ones no longer made. All it took was a change in the testing standard, all done somewhere behind the scenes.


Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,928
Likes: 34
G
Member
The real problem with AFCI is the amount of black science surrounding it. A GFCI has a simple performance standard and it is easy to test. AFCIs are sold on confidence alone and there is no real performance standard. Each manufacturer has it's own proprietary design that uses a secret method to decide whether the arc it sees is a fault or a normal operating situation. The different "classes" of AFCIs are just in the opinion of the manufacturer.
As far as I can tell, they tell the NRTL how to do the test then the NRTL does the test and lists the product.


Greg Fretwell
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5