ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Increasing demand factors in residential
by gfretwell - 03/28/24 12:43 AM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
Do we need grounding?
by NORCAL - 03/19/24 05:11 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
Cordless Tools: The Obvious Question
by renosteinke - 03/14/24 08:05 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 255 guests, and 16 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#195357 07/28/10 10:50 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,445
Likes: 2
Cat Servant
Member
"Equipotential grid:" seldom has anything so agitated code issues as much as when this idea was introduced to swimming pools a few cycles back. In 2005 the NEC called for a copper mesh; by 2008 the language had backed off somewhat, to where ordinary steel reinforcing mesh qualified.

The real confusion abounded when the pool deck was something besides concrete; for example, when pavers were set in a bed of sand.

When I did such a pool last year, I went 'beyond' the strict NEC requirements, and actually did use a roll of the copper mesh for the areas adjacent to the pool equipment, and between the pool equipment and the pool itself. My reasoning was that this area was where faults were more likely to develop, and I chose the copper for its' greater corrosion resistance.

That single roll of mesh (3' x 50'), and the associated split-bolt connectors, cost about $850. Net. My cost. It covered about 1/4 of the pool perimeter.

According to the latest IAEI update, this part of the code has been the subject of much discussion by the 2011 panel. It seems that ONE inspector, backed by ONE manufacturer, has instituted some manner of 'appeal' to get the copper mesh requirement included in the 2011 NEC.

This 'appeal' process is a new twist to me! Proposal, committee, vote ... then local adoption / ammendment .... I thought that's how the NEC was made - not by endless litigation funded by deep pockets.

What are your thoughts?

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 7
Member
Reno:

Want a laugh?

How about a 680.26 grid required on a wooden deck for a hot tub install!

Seriously, that is a story going around with some ECs as an opinion from a code specialist!

We had the grid debate here for above ground pools, opinion from State was....grid required...dirt, grass, stones (gravel), pavers, concrete, whatever!



John
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,923
Likes: 32
G
Member
I would say if there was an elevated deck of non-conductive material around the above ground pool, 3 feet out, no grid. If you can stand in the mud and put your hand in the pool, grid. The rule said "paved surface" in 2005, now it just says "perimeter surface" which would include grass/mud.
Reno the grid requirement in concrete was rebar, bonded, just like pool steel or you could use the copper mesh, later (2008) reduced to a single #8 ring.
The reality is, a single #3 rebar looping the pool might be cheaper that the #8 copper. They also removed the word "bar" so, presumably it could be regular "six over" steel mesh.
Ask your AHJ wink


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
S
Member
most local pool and/or hot tub companies here do the entire install , and then call sparky

i've always been a tad nixed that they get away with doing my job, and have me vouch for it by proxy

let the AHJ's have a word with them i say....

~S~

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,445
Likes: 2
Cat Servant
Member
As I understand it, the specific issue here is not just to have a grid, but to require it to be of copper. The advocate asserts that the single #8 wire that we already have encircling the pool is not adequate.

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,923
Likes: 32
G
Member
If you are bonding dirt, it has to be copper. If this is encased in concrete it can be the steel rebar or presumably after 2008, steel mesh.

I understand some people do not think a single #8 is sufficient but Florida decided in 2006-7 that this would work and adopted the 2008 rule early as an addendum.
(probably driven by the pool lobby)
I am not sure where any of this actually came from and what testing was done to prove the effectiveness but differences in soil material, moisture content and the surface itself would make this testing somewhat useless when any of those changed from the tested media.


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,445
Likes: 2
Cat Servant
Member
It HAS to be copper if you're bonding dirt? Where is that derived from? I spent a considerable amopuntof time with out local AHJ before developing my plan, and we all managed to miss that little detail.

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,923
Likes: 32
G
Member
680.26(B)(2)(b)(1)

You do not structurally reinforce dirt so (a) is out wink

Steel in dirt would be red dust an a year if you live in a place where it rains.


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,233
H
Member
I have also seen companies that sell rubber mats that go all around the hot tub so that you don't have to use the grounding ring. This comes in handy when you set a tub upon an existing concrete patio.

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,923
Likes: 32
G
Member
There are also wood deck kits that range from pine to teak for people who want a nicer look. I see them at my pool store.


Greg Fretwell

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5