ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
UL 508A SPACING
by ale348 - 03/29/24 01:09 AM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
Do we need grounding?
by NORCAL - 03/19/24 05:11 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (ale348), 302 guests, and 14 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#194391 05/29/10 02:10 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 171
M
Merlin Offline OP
Member
Correct me if I'm wrong in my thinking, please. I have a customer that currently has 3 seperate runs of 4/0 URD triplex. Each run is in its own Sch 40 PVC pipe. They travel 175 feet underground from the main service to a control building. One of the triplex runs are feeding a 200 amp(120/240)single phase panel. The other two are paralleled into a 400 amp disconnect feeding a phase converter.

My dilemma is, I am removing phase converter and installing true 3 phase service (120/240). Can this be done(rightfully) with the 3 runs. My thinking is to use all 3 runs to feed 400 amp switch. Can I parallel these 3 runs in the following manner?

Run #1: A,B,N
Run #2: B,C,N
Run #3: C,A,N

I would then run a new service to the single phase panel. Or should I just bite the bullet and start over with quadraplex?

Thanks, Merlin

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,273
T
Member
Your transformer taps from the utility tell the tale.

Just what phases are available?

You just can't assume anything.


Tesla
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,335
S
Member
Presuming that the POCO can give you three phase, I'd say that you would have to replace the wire. Each of the 3 neutrals that in parallel will carry 1/3 third of the unbalanced portion of the total. This could introduce counter electromotive force CEMF or impedece in the triplex.

A good way to look at it in an extreme condition example. 100 amps on any one phase would put 50 amps on it's respective phase in only two of the triplexes and 33 amps on each of the three triplex neutrals. Another way to look at it is that 100 amps between two phase will have one of the triplex balanced while the other two triplexes will be severely unbalanced.

Each of the unbalance triplexes will generate a megnetic field around them and impede current flow. Worse case, something in the triplexes can burn up. The only way your proposed plan would work if there was an even load on all three phases all the time. That is why it is very important to have all the conductors of a circuit in the same raceway.


"Live Awesome!" - Kevin Carosa
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 613
M
Member
In duct you have to have all 4 wires in each raceway and possibly a bonding conductor too.

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 7
Member
IMHO, I would 'bite the bullet'!


John
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 764
K
Member
Have you done a neutral load calc?
I'm just wondering if those triplex URD with reduced neutrals might possibly be a problem on a 3-phase system with multiple single-phase loads.
You said 120/240 3-phase, but is that correct?


Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5