ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
UL 508A SPACING
by ale348 - 03/29/24 01:09 AM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
Do we need grounding?
by NORCAL - 03/19/24 05:11 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (ale348), 302 guests, and 14 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,445
Likes: 2
Cat Servant
Member
Alright, call me late to the party, but ...

A new ad by AFC Cable brought this issue to the forefront: Just what is the difference between AC and MC? Apart from what's printed on the UL lable, that is.

This matters, because there are a few places in the NEC where one is acceptable, while the other is not. For example, if you ever find one of those mythical AFCI devices, and wish to use it in place of an AFCI breaker, you can use AC, but not MC. Health care locations are another such quagmire.

We have had "health care MC" around for a decade now (MC painted green), and Southwire has been marketing their "Simpull" MC (with a bare wire outside the mylar wrap, rather than the usual green wire) for half that time.
Now, it seems, AFC has done away completely with the inner mylar wrapping.
It seems that the 'definitions' I have had in my mind for these two products have been obsolete for some time. MC, contrary to what I thought, need not have a mylar wrapper ... and that bare ground they're putting in some MC pretty much duplicates the bond wire in AC.

Maybe it's time to combine these two sections, consolidate the UL standards, and eliminate the code restrictions on MC?

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 853
L
Member
Years ago-Mcs' first arrival,it had thhn 105C rated. AC did not.This was why we could use MC in fire alarm systems but not AC. Now I'm not sure of the difference either.Just the jacket-AL or steel.


Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 849
Y
Member
AFC puts out a Great book on there cables, Most electricans & even some inspectors do not know the proper uses for AC , MC, Hospital Grade.
Yoopersup

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,923
Likes: 32
G
Member
I suspect AC might just go the way of K&T. MC is overlapping it in virtually every regard. Guys like AFC are making MC in just about any configuration you could think of. It is becoming the most versatile wiring method out there.


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,233
H
Member
Greg,

I hated to use AC cable, I would only use MC once it came out. The old AC cable was useless if you had a lazy installer. They forgot to tighten up the connectors and you would lose your ground. I also saw where the outside case rusted away and the grounding was also lost.

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,923
Likes: 32
G
Member
They are making the new MC cable that uses the armor, with an internal aluminum conductor, for the ground path. I am curious how well that will stand the test of time. You do not terminate that aluminum conductor in any way beyond the clamp on the armor and they depend on incidental contact to the armor inside the cable for the ground path. If this is not a gas tight connection it will oxidize, in my opinion. I am curious how well it will perform after 20 years in a real world environment, particularly if that real world was damp, maybe with a little salt air.


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3
New Member
I seldom see AC cable these days.


Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5