ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Safety at heights?
by gfretwell - 04/23/24 03:03 PM
Old low volt E10 sockets - supplier or alternative
by gfretwell - 04/21/24 11:20 AM
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 504 guests, and 20 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,382
Likes: 7
Member
George:

FYI, transformer approx fault current ratings are within the Bussman Literature.

Keep in mind that these figures are approximations. I use the Bussman literature (with permission) for one of my classes.

The SPD book is a good investment for anyone looking for info, as is the website



John
Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,507
G
Member
Thanks Hotline- And I'm sure those numbers will be fine. I was trying to make a point of how miserable it is to work with some of these utility companies who have cut backs, the old timers are not there anymore and the contractors are stuck holding the bag.

My guess is the person who is asking for that information will not challenge any information the contractor provides.

In Michigan 70E usually never gets looked into until there is an "incident". OSHA (MiOSHA in Michigan) enforces 70E and electrical inspectors are rarely in that loop.

The other item I would like to mention is that Bussman has a CD that can be used for fault current calculations. I think it is free (it was to me) and it works on a PC or a Mac. That might be what the others are mentioning in this thread.

Last edited by George Little; 03/03/09 11:42 PM.

George Little
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,382
Likes: 7
Member
George:
I also use the "Safety Basics" materials from Bussmann. It's an interesting short <30 min item.

AS to your inuendo about supplying a 'lot of paper'....I used to do that! Be surprised how quick the inquisition came to a halt!


John
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 599
J
JBD Offline
Member
Originally Posted by HotLine1
JBD:
OK, you are allowed to be picky!

SCA that you calc result in a shall we say amperage figure that you use to determine the AIC of the buss bracing, and the OCP; right?

Based on the above I used the term KAIC, which is the basic end result of the calcs.

Perhaps my bad choice of terms.



Yes, you do use the SCA to determine what the AIC of your protective device needs to be. But you use the SCA, not the AIC, when making arc flash calculations.

A similar concept is how we use load amps to size branch breakers, but, we do not use the branch breakers to size the main service.

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,382
Likes: 7
Member
jbd:
Not beating a dead horse here, but this is from my original reply to the OP:

"The flash boundry calcs are not something I know how to do; I think it's best left to an engineer."



John
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 354
P
pdh Offline
Member
Originally Posted by George Little
Good Luck on getting the Available Fault current information on the transformer from the utility. They quit giving that out. "In the interest of saving money" Talk to Darrick.
AEP recently replaced the pad mount serving my house. I just checked the label for the rating and impedance, and did my own estimated calculation based on an underestimate of underground service "drop" length.

Of course that might be harder to do with pole pigs.

Another way to estimate fault current involves measuring voltage drop under 2 or more large known loads. You then extrapolate the voltage drop to zero to get the current. The larger the test loads, the more accurate the extrapolation can be.

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,507
G
Member
If Trick 440 still needs help with the calculations and the Arc Flash values, I was at a seminar in Grand Rapids and talked to Dave Vallier (a highly qualified engineer from Bussmann) and he can help you out here in SE Michigan. Bussmann is very active with IAEI and I would recommend contacting Dave at this address: dave.vallier@cooperindustries.com He suggested I convey this message to you.


George Little
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 599
J
JBD Offline
Member
My biggest word of advice is to not overestimate the amount of available bolted fault current. A high value of current will cause the protective devices to open fast which reduces the arc flash incident energy. A more realistic value of bolted fault current may cause the devices to open slowly resulting in higher incident energy.

If I have a single fault current value (especially if it looks like an infinite bus calculation), I will run additional arc flash calculations at 50% and 75% of bolted fault.

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5