|
1 members (Scott35),
530
guests, and
17
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 849
OP
Member
|
I don't have a 1990 NEC Code can anyone tell me what the section in the Current Code 2005 517.30 (C) Wireing Requirements (Seperation from Other circuits said in 1990). A hospital wired under the 1990 Code is being told by the Federal Goverment (Medicare) it must change to 2005 stanards even thought it was built under 1990 NEC Code.? Thanks Yoopers
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
Member
|
Ernie, my 1990 code book is at work, if noone else comes forward before tomorrow I'll get back to you then.
Going by memory, there were only Emergency and Normal systems in those days, they were not divided into Critical, Life Safety, and Equipment Branches.
Roger
Last edited by Roger; 01/14/08 08:43 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,335
Member
|
I am looking in the '93. I may have '90 in the office. In the '93 there is only one change which was something in the exception #4.
NEC90 517-30(C)(1). Sepreration from other circuits.
"Live Awesome!" - Kevin Carosa
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
Member
|
Ernie, I was wrong, it is basically the same as it is today. The Essential Systems are Emergency and Equipment, and the Emergency was in fact broke down into Critical and Life Safety Branches, 517-30(b)(2)
517-30(c)(1) requires the seperation from other circuits the same as todays wording.
Roger
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 849
OP
Member
|
So as you read it There is a Equipment Transfer Switch and loads required per code off that. Then there can be a second transfer switch feeding switchgear containing Both Life safety and Critical Breakers that must feed life safety load pnls, and critical pnl loads . and as I read it theses loads MUST be kept seperate of each Other and all other loads from the switchgear then on. Yoopers up
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
Member
|
Yes, with the exception of Emergency and Exit lights.
There will have to be at least 2 transfer switches (1 for the Equipment System and 1 for the EMergency System) unless the Generator is 150 KVA or less
Roger
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 849
OP
Member
|
Is there any time OR exceptiopns where Life safety and critical loads can come out of the same Branch circuit panel?? I think not but just asking. Also circuits not listed as Cirical in the NEC should not be in the Critical panel also right.again I think not but just asking. Yoopers
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,213
Member
|
Is there any time OR exceptiopns where Life safety and critical loads can come out of the same Branch circuit panel?? I think not but just asking. Also circuits not listed as Cirical in the NEC should not be in the Critical panel also right.again I think not but just asking. Yoopers On a military base! Per uniform facilities criteria (which references the NEC as code, btw) There's no separation of life safety from other essential mission loads. If it requires generator, it's on one switchboard. Sometimes two, for redundancy. Generally speaking: Emergency Power = generator Critical Power = UPS
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
Member
|
Is there any time OR exceptiopns where Life safety and critical loads can come out of the same Branch circuit panel?? I think not but just asking. Also circuits not listed as Cirical in the NEC should not be in the Critical panel also right.again I think not but just asking. Yoopers You are correct in regards to both type of circuits coming from one panel, the answer is no. The Critical Branch is actually pretty lax as to what it can serve, see 517.33. The Life Safety Branch is specific as to what can be fed from it and this is reflected in the first sentence of 517.32 Roger
Last edited by Roger; 01/18/08 08:12 PM.
|
|
|
Posts: 46
Joined: March 2013
|
|
|
|
|