ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Increasing demand factors in residential
by gfretwell - 03/28/24 12:43 AM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
Do we need grounding?
by NORCAL - 03/19/24 05:11 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
Cordless Tools: The Obvious Question
by renosteinke - 03/14/24 08:05 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 262 guests, and 17 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#171244 11/23/07 02:45 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 240
Member
I have a cutomer building a new house, which he will have a ham radio. something about interference all outlets(not lighting) need to be on same circuit. he said he brought a 30 amp into his existing set up(at old house/future old house)and tapped 120 volt outlets off that, and drove ground rod down. I suggested putting a sub-panel and feeding ham radio 30 amp/240 volt outlet and 120 volt outlets from here.
he wants to drive a ground rod for radio, but i think that would be a violation since it wouldn't be tied with service ground rods. wouldn't the ground be well established with the four wire i feed sub with? that it would mitagate need for additional ground? and if additional ground rod neccessary then it would have to tie with the two at service which really would be redundant...of course the other suggestion could be to run 4 wire and a single gounding from service rods to sub panel. dont know much about ham radios and this interference he's worried about.

any help, comments appreciated.
thanks,
H2O

Last edited by watersparkfalls; 11/23/07 02:46 AM.
Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Tom Offline
Member
You can drive the ground rod your customer wants and connect it to the equipment grounding conductor at the proposed sub-panel or the transmitter. This rod does not need to be bonded to the other electrodes that may be present. See 250.54

Just remember that the earth cannot be used as the return path for ground faults, the sub-panel must have an equipment ground.


Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 251
W
Member
Big mistake not to bond the grounds together. All grounds need to be at the same potential. If lightning comes into the power line, and the radio ground system has a lower impedance than the power ground, the surge will seek the better ground THRU the radio. All grounds at the same potential, any voltage rise will be equal in the grounding system with no current flow, no damaged equipment. This is a code requirement. I install communications equipment, cell sites, radio towers,etc. We bond ALL grounds together. When bonding several ground rods together, do not use a complete loop, as this will create inductance, limiting current flow. (I teach a grounding course to Ham groups and others)Robert

Last edited by WESTUPLACE; 11/23/07 11:18 AM.
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,335
S
Member
If the electrical system is wired properly then additional ground rods are not needed. If the customer still wants additional ground rods and want to pay for them, put them in but they HAVE to be bonded together. As for the interference issue, I presuming (never assume) that what he is talking about is when dealing with ampliphiers, you want them on the same phase. you could get poor performance since the electical "push" through the equipment is 180 dergees out of since. I do not think this is an issue with todays electronics.


"Live Awesome!" - Kevin Carosa
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 399
A
Member
Fourth wire from service to sub panel will establish the bond for a supplementary ground rod. Recommend a #8 Cu even if the circuit is 30 amp wired with # 10 Cu.
See 250.54


Alan--
If it was easy, anyone could do it.
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Tom Offline
Member
After reading WESTUPLACE's post, I think you should explore this interference/grounding issue with your customer some more and perhaps post them again so WESTUPLACE can give us some additional guidance. I have the feeling that your customer may not be explaining his concerns properly. Though I am not a HAM operator, I'd like to find out what your customers problems might be and what the solution really is.

Supplementary grounding electrodes do not have to be bonded to other electrodes on the premises. The requirements of 250.50, 250.53(C) and 250.56 do not apply to supplementary electrodes.


Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,335
S
Member
Originally Posted by Tom


Supplementary grounding electrodes do not have to be bonded to other electrodes on the premises. The requirements of 250.50, 250.53(C) and 250.56 do not apply to supplementary electrodes.


You have my undivided attention. Please reference where it is kosher NOT to bond all the grounding electrodes together inthe NEC that applies to the ham radio issue.


"Live Awesome!" - Kevin Carosa
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Tom Offline
Member
Originally Posted by sparkyinak



You have my undivided attention. Please reference where it is kosher NOT to bond all the grounding electrodes together inthe NEC that applies to the ham radio issue.


I don't see anything in Article 810 that would require a supplementary grounding electrode that is connected to a sub-panel or equipment ground of the radio equipment to be bonded to all other electrodes. If the ground rod was connected to the antenna mast or an antenna discharge unit, then there is definitely a requirement to do so.

Of course, I could be wildly mistaken, wouldn't be the first time.


Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 399
A
Member
When the supplementary ground rod is bonded to the ground in the sub panel it is also becoming bonded to the service, and all the grounding electrodes that the service is bonded to.
The hazard arises when the supplementary ground rod is not bonded to the system ground but, is isolated. That is when the Earth becomes the only link between the two rod systems, and it is prohibited.


Alan--
If it was easy, anyone could do it.
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 183
N
Member
The supplementary ground must be tied into the system ground. This ground is an RF ground; the conductors between the radio or tuner form part of the antenna's tuned circuit and must be short to be effective. The service ground is usually too far away to be useful at RF.

In reality, he probably wants to set up a ground window or ground plate to form a single-point ground where all of the cables enter the shack. This plate would have all of the lightning arrestors on it and should be bonded to the RF ground as well as the power ground. Ideally, all cables entering the shack should go thru arrestors on this plate.

They may want to look at the tech notes at www.polyphaser.com for more info on grounding and lightning protection.

Placing a subpanel in the shack is a very good idea; I would use a main breaker to give a single point to shutdown everything in the room (except the lights) in an emergency.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5