ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
Do we need grounding?
by NORCAL - 03/19/24 05:11 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
Cordless Tools: The Obvious Question
by renosteinke - 03/14/24 08:05 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 248 guests, and 16 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 220
T
Member
I have a question about conductor sizing.
I have a 1200 amp main breaker on a 120/208Y service feeding a grocery store.
I came up with (4) 500 MCM per phase.
380A x4= 1520amps.
1520A x .80(T310.15(b)(2)(a)4-6 conductors in a raceway.=1216 A
1216A Round down to next standard= 1200A.

Have I gone astray somewhere? With all the lights, computers, etc. I would consider the neutral a current carrying conductor. I have seen other topics on here and none had mentioned the wire size I came up with.

As always thanks for the help gentlemen!
Gary

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 507
M
Member
I would run 4 conduits, each containing 4 400MCM...A,B,C,N

For derating purposes, you use the 90deg column...so 400MCM is 380A x 4 = 1520A * 0.8 = 1216A

However, whether the Neutral is actually a CCC can be disputed. If not, then you can get away with 350MCM




Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 220
T
Member
I thought you could only use the column that corresponded to the temperature rating or the terminations?

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 507
M
Member
for sizing...for derating you can use the 90deg column..

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 220
T
Member
I dont understand what you mean. I thought you sized the conductor according to ampacity required, then adjusted the selected conductor according to ambient temp, # of conductors in conduit, etc. I am not trying to sound obtuse, but I guess I was tuaght differently.

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 507
M
Member
Originally Posted by trekkie76
I dont understand what you mean. I thought you sized the conductor according to ampacity required, then adjusted the selected conductor according to ambient temp, # of conductors in conduit, etc. I am not trying to sound obtuse, but I guess I was tuaght differently.


nope...you size the conductors based on the terminal temp rating...but for derating purposes only, you can use the 90deg column. because you are worried about the insulation rating, not the connection rating.

without derating, 4-350's or 4-400's have enough ampacity in the the 75deg table to carry the load. but for derating only, you can use the 90deg table.

maybe someone else can explain it better.

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 220
T
Member
but wouldnt that result in a conductor sized below the ampacity of the 75 degree column?

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 220
T
Member
i am going to look at this tommorrow morning and laugh im sure!

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 507
M
Member
nope...not in this case...

I will say this though...find out if the inspector wants you to consider the neutral as a CCC...if not, no derating necessary...then you can run 350's...

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 40
G
Member
I am thinking the same as Mahlere. I was taught you size your conductors to the terminal ratings of the equipment you are hooking up, which most of the time is the 75 deg C colum. You use that colum for your basic calculation for ampacity, then if you derate due to conduit fill or a change in ambient temperature..you look right to the 90deg colum. So rather than changing wire gauge you change insulation type by looking at the 90 deg colum only for conduit fill or ambient temp derating. This was explained to me in the Mike Holt exam book. Good luck, Brian


Brian Gibbons
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5