ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Increasing demand factors in residential
by gfretwell - 03/28/24 12:43 AM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
Do we need grounding?
by NORCAL - 03/19/24 05:11 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
Cordless Tools: The Obvious Question
by renosteinke - 03/14/24 08:05 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 297 guests, and 18 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#15616 10/23/02 10:09 PM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 54
W
wayne Offline OP
Member
i was woundering when you change out a service do you or do your local inspectors require you to bring everything up to code.
in our area NC we are only required based on what we touch.

although when we do a service upgrade we figure on bringing up to code in our price,and install same.
thanks for your input.

#15617 10/24/02 01:23 AM
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,443
Likes: 3
Member
Hi Wayne,
Over here in NZ,if an upgrade is performed,
of a consumers mains,(service) it must be fully inspected, tested and certified.
This is the same if a place has been disconnected from the Network, for a period of more than 6 months, we normally have to check out all of the installation and make appropriate changes, so that the installation complies, before it is re-connected.
Normally these are "Do-jobs", they are never quoted for, because of the large number of things that can crop up. [Linked Image]

#15618 10/24/02 06:13 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
S
Member
Our poco's are usually the only residential inspectors, who's concern ends @ the main disco.
Most of thier desires follow art 230 of the NEC, so in terms of updating to code that part of the install does.

#15619 10/24/02 07:04 AM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,457
E
Member
Service upgrade here requires service is up to code. Thats it. If the inspector sees a safety hazard it is up to him to notify the homeowner that it should be repaired. Some inspectors do like to walk through these old basements barking out the orders "fix this fix that" I ususally just ignore them as they have no authority to force the electrician to fix anything other than the electricians mistakes. If I figured a service to include bringing the house up to code I would be out of business. In this area with the majority of housing being over 35 years old it would be quite an undertaking.

#15620 10/24/02 11:38 AM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,498
T
Member
6 months? Here in Austria it's 3 years, and this is new. Same thing applies for gas systems. (municipial power and gas used to be one company, along with public transportation and undertaking (all cemetaries belong to them), and in fact still are. On the paper they're seperate, but 100% owner is still the Wiener Stadtwerke AG, as it has always been)

#15621 10/24/02 08:51 PM
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 74
S
Member
Here in Chs. SC, not only do they make you bring the house to code for service upgrades, but also for meter/main relocations. This includes the recept. per wall spacing, smoke detectors in all bedrooms (interconnected), dedicated grnd. circuits to kitchen appliances, outside recepts. at front and back of the house, gfi's everywere exc..........
It really makes it impossible for the homeowner to afford. So instead of making any improvement they make none at all. It really seems extreme to me. This rule also applies to services that have been cut for 1 year or more. In commercial upgrades, the only requirements are exit and emergency lights.
John

[This message has been edited by scjohn (edited 10-24-2002).]

#15622 10/24/02 09:06 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,457
E
Member
John this seems very excessive and extreme and places an unjust burden on homeowners. What is their rationale behind this all or nothng approach?

#15623 10/24/02 10:01 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 196
C
Member
ahj's in oregon i've dealt with dont call this the same. whenever this comes up i ask the local inspector about the job in question. like you say, the inspectors know if it costs too much that the owners wont do anything at all, so they mostly allow partial upgrades as long as its safe. we never connect existing feeders or SE wires that are undersized or worn, but thats usually not a problem, and we always re-do the GE system

if you think about it, the ones who need the upgrading the most are the ones who cant afford it. pretty tough rule scjohn. do they make you install air bags and anitlock abs brakes in old cars when you do a oil change? [Linked Image]

#15624 10/24/02 10:18 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 914
E
Member
In Georgia it varries by jurisdiction. Some are lax and don't really require any thing, but most require GFI's in the bath and kitchen and hard wired smokes, interconnected if possible(they don't make you tear up the house).

#15625 10/25/02 10:48 AM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 597
E
Member
In Minnesota, the higher the population density, the more collateral requirements included with the service size increase in an existing building.

I work mostly in the inner city, where the service size increase includes going over all branch circuits to meet what is basically a VA / FHA Electrical Certification. These are the [b][i]Minneapolis Minimum Electrical Requirements[/i][/b] .

The really helpful language states that the service and branch circuits must be safe and all exposed abandoned or visible hazardous wiring must be removed. The State of MN throws in the smoke detection requirements, along with local fire districts.


Al Hildenbrand
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5