ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Increasing demand factors in residential
by gfretwell - 03/28/24 12:43 AM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
Do we need grounding?
by NORCAL - 03/19/24 05:11 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
Cordless Tools: The Obvious Question
by renosteinke - 03/14/24 08:05 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (gfretwell), 32 guests, and 14 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#151435 12/30/06 07:53 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,445
Likes: 2
Cat Servant
Member
We've all had to prop ladders against gutters and eaves, in order to get on the roof. One thing that has always bothered me is the way the ladder seems to shift just as you make the roof/ladder transition.

Here are some pics of my 16' "4 way" ladder in use. Not only do I NOT have to lean it against a gutter, it is extremely stable.

Something to consider.


[Linked Image]


[Linked Image]

[This message has been edited by renosteinke (edited 01-01-2007).]

Arc Flash PPE Clothing, LOTO & Insulated Tools
#151436 01/02/07 08:49 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,143
D
Member
I have a 16' one like that I got from a buddy. Those are also great for replacing the hanging fixtures in the entry halls of the classic 1970's raised ranch homes.

I thought about getting one in fiberglass, but they're heavy on the back and the wallet. Last time I looked it was $420+! [Linked Image]

#151437 01/02/07 08:55 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,445
Likes: 2
Cat Servant
Member
DOug, my 16' Louisville set me back about $260. I'd keep looking. Please do not confuse this ladder with the "Little Giant" type.

#151438 01/03/07 04:15 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
John,
I thought that the ladder safety rules said you need to extend the ladder 3' above the roof line.
Don


Don(resqcapt19)
#151439 01/03/07 08:59 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,445
Likes: 2
Cat Servant
Member
Don, I have seen that "rule," and I have a LOT of problems with it.

It was leaning against such an extension that once caused the base of a ladder to come free on me. I know, the movied always show a nice graceful transition, but this is the moment when the ladder seems most likely to move.

My own preference is for the ladder to project very little above the roof line, and for me to go 'straight over the top,' rather than shift to the side.

This arrangement of the 4-way does project a foot or so above the roof edge. The outstretched "feet" make it VERY secure, with virtually no wobble or shift as you make the transition.

Most important, the ladder is NOT leaning against a flimsy sheet-metal gutter. Besides being flimsy, sheet metal is slick .... which makes it so much easier for the ladder to shift.

Now, IF your ordinary extension ladder is securely tied off at the roof, AND the feet are placed in a manner where they simply cannot move on ANY direction, the "step to the side" can work out quite well.

A final 'detail" to consider is that the "usual" rules are written assuming "usual" ladders. This 4-way ladder is neither fish (extension) nor fowl (step).

#151440 01/04/07 12:19 AM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,923
Likes: 32
G
Member
I don't usually have a problem with a ladder slipping when it is up against one of those extruded aluminum gutters. When you are "busting the deuce" like me it makes two deep dents in the edge that hold the ladder steady.


Greg Fretwell
#151441 01/04/07 03:14 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
Regardless of how we feel about a rule if we are working under OSHA that would likely be a violation.

The company I work for would have two issues with that ladder.

1) It's metal, we do not use any conductive ladders. We don't buy them we don't borrow them.

Quote
1926.1053(b)(12)
Ladders shall have nonconductive siderails if they are used where the employee or the ladder could contact exposed energized electrical equipment, except as provided in 1926.951(c)(1) of this part.

2) The set up, we would have to have the top extend past the roof a greater distance.

Quote
1926.1053(b)(1)
When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.



[This message has been edited by iwire (edited 01-04-2007).]


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
#151442 01/04/07 12:19 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,923
Likes: 32
G
Member
The non-conductive comment seems particularly appropriate since the ladder in the picture is resting on a raceway. It doesn't take too much imagination to seeing that be damaged while you are blindly jamming that ladder into a secure position from the ground.


Greg Fretwell
#151443 01/04/07 03:47 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,445
Likes: 2
Cat Servant
Member
It may not be obvious due to paint, but that IS a fiberglass ladder.

Also, the ladder is not contacting any of the conduit; it passes over it. Good point to consider, though.

As for the "OSHA rule"... one of the very first issues OSHA had to litigate involved this very issue.
In the particulars of that case, the OSHA rule said trucks had to have their wheels chocked while in the loading dock. The defendant did not chock the wheels; he had anchors in the pit, and used a come-along to pull the truck tight against the dock.
OSHA argued 'a rule is a rule.' The defendant argued that his way was better.
The ruling, which was upheld on appeal, requires OSHA to recognise 'other approaches' that are as good, or better, than what the book specifies.

I believe that the 4-way ladder, used as pictured here, meets or exceeds any extension or tie-down requirement that was written with a different type of ladder (extension ladder) in mind.

This is, after all, America. We are NOT mindless serfs to a ruling bureaucracy.



[This message has been edited by renosteinke (edited 01-04-2007).]

#151444 01/04/07 05:51 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
It looked like a metal ladder.

Quote
This is, after all, America. We are NOT mindless serfs to a ruling bureaucracy

I guess that depends on the scale of the jobs you work on.

For us and the jobs we go after it is absolutely essential that we follow the OSHA regs.

The GCs we work for look at past OSHA compliance and a workers comp index.

Personally I would not climb that ladder as pictured, I envision it rolling over one direction or the other.

But to each their own, I have never liked making the swing from the ladder to the roof when the ladder is resting on the metal gutters or flashing.

We generally rent lifts as to keep us off extension ladders.


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5