ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Increasing demand factors in residential
by gfretwell - 03/28/24 12:43 AM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
Do we need grounding?
by NORCAL - 03/19/24 05:11 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
Cordless Tools: The Obvious Question
by renosteinke - 03/14/24 08:05 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 255 guests, and 16 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 12
B
Member
Hi Everyone,
I have recently taken on a CCTV job and i was wondering if using RG6 Quad Shielded 18AWG cable is the best to use. Is there any disadvantages to using such a high quality cable. I was told RG59/U is the way to go, but i've also heard that it has losses over a 20 metre run. Anybody's help will be much appreciated.

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,443
Likes: 3
Member
Hi there Brite-Spark!.
It really depends what's around the area where you are installing the coax and the length of the run.
Personally I think that standard RG-6/U coax would be more than adequate for this application.
That's all I've used in the past and never had any problems.

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 223
A
Member
Given that you're dealing with baseband video with a bandwidth of 50Hz to about 5MHz, the losses of RG59 are very low in comparison to it's usual use at VHF and UHF. Even for VHF, a 20m run of RG59 does not cause concern.
One of the instruments I work with is a video signal test rack where by means of a swtiching unit and pattern generator, baseband video can be fed through a number of different things to observe the effects. Such things include attenuators, filters, equalisers, and relevant to this topic, a 300m roll of military grade RG59 which would be about 25 years old.
Compared to a straight through connection, there is a slight loss of contrast (ie. there's less than 1Vp-p of video at the end of the coax) when the 300m length of coax is placed in the signal path. Otherwise there doesn't appear to be any degradation. Winding up the contrast slightly on the monitor and you wouldn't even know.
RG6 has lower loss than RG59 and is rapidly taking over with cable, satellite, and digital TV. The cost difference isn't as high as it once was, but beware of some really cheap nasty cable out there.
To answer the question, it would be much more than 20m before worrying about the loss of RG59. There is certainly no disadvantage in using RG6.

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 12
B
Member
Aussie240, u said to beware of cheap and nasty cable out there. What should i be looking for to check if its a bad quality cable?

So, if i use RG6 Quad shield i should be almost certain that i will not get any problems, such as noise and losses.

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,443
Likes: 3
Member
Brite-Spark,
Quote
What should I be looking for to check if its a bad quality cable?
The better quality co-axial cables have the foil sheilding bonded to the dielectric insulation over the centre conductor.
Also, the shielding braid should be tinned copper and should be as thick as possible.
I'd also go with a coax that has either a foam or an air-spaced dielectric covering on the centre conductor.
I'd avoid any cables that have a stranded centre conductor, I've had nothing but problems with this sort of cable, especially when using it with F-type connectors.
I have to agree with Aussie though, there are some really dodgy cables out there, worst place you can buy it from here in NZ is a DIY store. [Linked Image]

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 161
G
Member
I've got several 100 metre long RG59 cctv cables installed here, and they are all fine. For baseband video there is no problem with loss so long as you avoid the air-spaced cables. Moisture can get into any cable, but it's worst with the air-spaced types.

Do try to keep the terminations in the dry, as the cheaper nickel plated bnc connectors corrode to a high resistance or even a diode effect. This can be cured with silver plated bncs, as silver oxide is the only conductive oxide, but they are a good bit pricier than nickel plated.

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,443
Likes: 3
Member
Just as an after-thought, could you get all of that braiding (that a Quad-shielded coax has)
into a BNC connector?.

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 12
B
Member
Yeh your are probably right Trumpy, you wouldn't fit a bnc Connector on Quad shield. I'll just use RG59, tinned copper cable and it'll be more than enough. Thanks guys for all your help.

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,443
Likes: 3
Member
Good on ya mate.
Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against RG-59 cable at all, or Quad-shield for that matter.
Up until a couple of years ago, I was using an entire system of RG-59 here at home and pumping UHF signals down it (Highest frequency 800MHz) with no noticeable picture degradation.
I had pretty shortish runs though.
Best of luck with your install B/Spark, let us know how it went. [Linked Image]

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 247
T
Member
Other options include cat-5..
you can get baluns for cat5, and run camera power over the spare pairs.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5