ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Increasing demand factors in residential
by gfretwell - 03/28/24 12:43 AM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
Do we need grounding?
by NORCAL - 03/19/24 05:11 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
Cordless Tools: The Obvious Question
by renosteinke - 03/14/24 08:05 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 255 guests, and 16 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#128698 10/10/03 11:00 AM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8
J
Juan Offline OP
Junior Member
I din't know where to post this. Hope this the right place. In the company where I work the grounding has become a big issue. Some of the 200 & 400 amp panels and some XFMR's are grounded on the water pipe, some are grounded to a 8' rod and some are grounded to both. A new journeyman has made an issue about the grounding on water pipes. My question is what is the best and legal (In Torrance California) way to ground this panels and XTFM's. Also all of this panels do not have a ground coming from the main panel board.

To correct this I was thinking of drilling a 8' copper rod next to some of the beams with a jumper. Then removing the grounding wires from the water pipe and putting them to the beams.

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

#128699 10/10/03 01:14 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 246
R
Member
There is no way we can answer your question due to the different parts of your electrical supply.

Break down the different parts, into service equipment, feeders, panels not service equipment, and equipment, such as transformers, motors, etc..

Then read the codebook.

Do not assume that adding a rod next to beams will provide for a quality grounded system. In fact, this may create a hazard. You may need to hire a grounding firm to provide the correct specs for this job.

You should also study as much on grounding as you can. It is a specialized field, so if you don't understand it, get help.

What was the new journeyman's concern with the water pipe grounding?

Rick

[This message has been edited by rmiell (edited 10-10-2003).]

#128700 10/10/03 01:15 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
R
Moderator
I don't think I can fully answer your question if you don't have a code book. If you do, read article 250.50 through 250.70 and also read 250.30.

The code states that if available on the premises wiring sytem, all electrodes must be used. Please do not remove anything from your water pipe.

EDIT: Looks like we posted at the same time! At least our answers were consistent! [Linked Image]

[This message has been edited by Ryan_J (edited 10-10-2003).]


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City
#128701 10/10/03 04:07 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,527
B
Moderator
A couple of things to remember on separately-derived-system grounding. In many areas, a connection to local building steel is the most desirable for reducing potential differences between gear and most effective for secondary-side overcurrent-device operation.

Also, don’t forget that the primary-side overcurrent device may be far less effective if there is not a continuous equipment-ground conductor between the local-transformer core/frame and the source overcurrent device—maybe in a service-entrance switchboard for smaller installations where plant-owned secondary-unit substations are not installed. These two grounding/bonding connections are clearly for different purposes, but both almost always involve a local drytype transformer.




[This message has been edited by Bjarney (edited 10-10-2003).]


Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5