ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Safety at heights?
by gfretwell - 04/23/24 03:03 PM
Old low volt E10 sockets - supplier or alternative
by gfretwell - 04/21/24 11:20 AM
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 235 guests, and 27 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
#115630 11/23/03 11:22 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 681
P
Member
Bill
I respectfully disagree with the your interpretation of the canopies/domes.
370-16(a) permits using the volume of the canopy/dome. I believe the exception you are referencing is to allow for those fixture wires not to be counted as part of box fill.

Pierre


Pierre Belarge
#115631 11/23/03 11:37 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 4
Member
Pierre,

370-16(A) (and 314.16(A)) talks about "domed covers, extension rings, etc that are marked with their volume in cubic inches..".

I've never seen a fixture canopy that had its volume marked in cubic inches. If this is a 4 cu. in box what code section allows 3 #14s to be in it?

Bill


Bill
#115632 11/24/03 08:19 AM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Member
This came up before. I have also never seen a canopy with a volume indicated ?
However, wouldn't the volume be based on a (pancake) box with a blank cover installed?

#115633 11/24/03 10:43 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
R
Moderator
The ones that I usually see are used in residential and are non metallic (without the clamps).

With that in mind, how do you view it as an inspector? What do you allow or not allow? I will permit (1) 14-2 cable and no more at the rough stage. My reasoning is that I see very few lights with the volume marked on the canopy, and I don't want people having to change out their expensive lights because the rough doesn't comply. Any thoughts on this?


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City
#115634 11/24/03 12:42 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Member
Ryan,

Would you flag a 14/3 NM installation to a pancake for a ceiling fan?

This is commonly installed around here.

#115635 11/24/03 12:49 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
R
Moderator
Yes I would, unless the installer could show me that the fan has a volume allowance in the canopy. Otherwise I would ask for a "4-O" box instead of a "3-O" box.


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City
#115636 11/24/03 01:32 PM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,081
T
Member
Are "pancakes" rated for a ceiling fan (50 lbs, off the top of my head)?

#115637 11/25/03 08:33 AM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Member
Thinkgood,

There are specific pancakes designed for fans and heavier fixtures.

#115638 11/25/03 09:04 AM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,294
Member

#115639 11/25/03 08:04 PM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 518
J
Member
The problem with these things is that they are often installed so that they are not flush with the wall surface.
Has anyone ever seen extension rings for them?

Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5