ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 205 guests, and 28 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
If this is a 525 or 527 application, GFCI or an assured equipment grounding program is required. An assured equipment grounding program would be almost impossible to implement for the application, that only leaves GFCI protection.
The code could use some clarification in this type of installation. Doc has correctly made the point that the change in 520 was indented to apply to large traveling shows, but that is not what the words in the definition of "performance area" say. You can make a case to apply 520, 525 or 527 to the application. Two of these would require GFCI protection.
Don


Don(resqcapt19)
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 311
F
Member
Don-

I agree. After reading my Mcgraw-Hill's NEC Handbook it seemed quite apparent that GFCI protection was required on the 240V, 50A receptacle. My NFPA NEC Handbook didn't touch on it with any commentary. 525.23(C)

Frank

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 440
Likes: 3
Member
Heck Frank,
You don't have anything to be sorry for.
Quote
I'm sorry if I caused a little confusion by not being more specific.
If you would have been more specific, we wouldn't have had anything to talk about. I love this forum because we come from all over the country, and even the world, and we can help each other solve problems.

An example of something that I learned from this thread is reading the ROP's, and ROC's. I've never really paid attention to them, but Don mentioned them in one of his posts, and I can tell you that Ol' Doc will be reading them in the future.

Thanks to all. Frank, I think you have made your decision to go with GFI protection (you can't go wrong by using GFI's), and I would "chalk" this up as another successful thread.

Regards,
Doc


The Watt Doctor
Altura Cogen
Channelview, TX
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
Doc,
The ROPs and ROCs are great tools for trying to understand what the words really mean. I have copies back to the '84 code cycle and often look at them to answer some of the questions on the forums. Anyone who makes a proposal will automatically get a copy of the ROP and those making comments will get a copy of the ROC. They are also available to anyone on request (either paper or CD) as well as being on line. Remember that all proposals for the 2005 code must be received by the NFPA prior to 5PM, November 1, 2002.
Don


Don(resqcapt19)
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Member
This 2005 NEC Proposal form can be found in the back of the 2002 NEC, or you can print it out here.

http://www.nfpa.org/PDF/NEC2005ProposalForm.pdf?src=necdigest


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,527
B
Moderator
This has been an interesting and well-supported :-} exchange to follow. [Darn Crazy Internet Fad…]

Devil's advocate for a moment—What kind of hazards could be created with this PA-system outage? Would its loss generate a potential hazard/panic situation or otherwise become a critical issue?

There are PA-type systems used for facility-wide verbal emergency-egress instructions, but they are supervised [characteristics of the electrical circuits to various peripheral devices are continuously monitored for readiness and centrally alarmed.]

So it is unlikely that with dissimilarly conceived and engineered portable systems—primarily intended for entertainment applications—havw no intent of contingency operation. Although this may someday be the case, {and even routine or mandatory} the portable would not seem to qualify as, or serve a parallel function to that of a fixed system installed for the purpose.

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5