ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Safety at heights?
by gfretwell - 04/23/24 03:03 PM
Old low volt E10 sockets - supplier or alternative
by gfretwell - 04/21/24 11:20 AM
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 228 guests, and 10 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
#109666 02/03/07 11:30 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,213
S
Member
Minimum distance between live components increases with voltage- after a certain voltage, you wouldn't legally be able to fit components into boxes like this without dividers.

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

#109667 02/03/07 10:01 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 247
T
Member
Are you sure that the new switches are not controlling contactors, perhaps in the cabinet they are mounted in?

#109668 02/05/07 09:01 AM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,294
Member
In all fairness,

[Linked Image]

they did double the number of switches. Now the switches control single 277 Volt circuits each.
They are still in 4-gang boxes, mounted to the side of an old (GE, I think) panelboard.
There are no contactors.

The issue of >300 volts between adjacent devices still remains. 404.8(B). It still isn't right.

It would be a simple matter to fix it, but it won't happen unless this thing blows up again.

How could it be fixed?

#109669 02/05/07 03:47 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 794
Likes: 3
W
Member
Quote
The issue of >300 volts between adjacent devices still remains. 404.8(B). It still isn't right.

If all the switches in the same box are run off the same phase of 277V, then that shouldn't be an issue. But the fact that there are 4 boxes means that either one phase has extra loading (unless some of the switches control smaller than the average load), or the above rule is violated in at least one of the boxes.

#109670 02/05/07 08:56 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 787
L
Member
3 phase breaker panel with every other numbered circuit on the same phase? I don't think so.

Perhaps someone is using a single phase panel with two legs of a three phase system. That still sounds unlikely.

Larry C

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5