ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Increasing demand factors in residential
by gfretwell - 03/28/24 12:43 AM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
Do we need grounding?
by NORCAL - 03/19/24 05:11 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
Cordless Tools: The Obvious Question
by renosteinke - 03/14/24 08:05 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (gfretwell), 32 guests, and 14 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#108543 03/30/04 09:45 AM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,294
Member
Submitted by Big John

During the renovation of a bathroom, these photos were taken of the violations as they were discovered:

[Linked Image]

This box was discovered behind one layer of tile and two layers of sheet-rock.


[Linked Image]

This switch box was set back at least 1.25 inches from the finished surface of the wall. Even with the "mounting-screw extension" only the very tip of the switch lever protruded beyond the cover plate


[Linked Image]

Another buried box, this time unsecured and with no cover. This one found behind the ceiling in the shower stall.


[Linked Image]

The receptacle was originally installed sometime in the '70's so it may predate the GFCI requirement. However, it was replaced within the last couple years and still no GFCI (the copper pipe is the vent stack for the sink that was mounted right next to it). The NM cable below was feeding a pull-chain light above the sink, no junction box, the splice simply buried in the wall.


[Linked Image]

This beauty was also buried in the ceiling. The original splices came through a crows-foot and were held behind that hanging light canopy before the NM was tied in. The NM cables feed the receptacle in the previous picture and an overhead light.


[Linked Image]

This is my favorite, it makes absolutely no sense: This is the setup for the vapor-tight light fixture in the shower stall. The feeder into the far octagon box, then into a custom J-box in the middle, both of which were buried behind the ceiling. There isn't even a splice inside the custom J-box: The conductors from the BX go right out of an open KO and join the fixture wires in that flying splice above the joist. If the BX had been simply connected directly to the box for the vapor-tight fixture, they would've saved two additional J-boxes and prevented several code violations.

Big John

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

#108544 03/30/04 03:53 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,143
D
Member
Ahhh, but you're trying to apply logic to what these cretins were doing!

Love the pics! Thanks!

#108545 04/01/04 11:02 AM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,081
T
Member
Actually, wouldn't the concealed junction boxes have been OK before the NEC was changed?

This does, however, look much like the houses I have seen in this area that are gutted and remodeled, especially the shot of the box in the area of the lathe (sp?).

#108546 04/01/04 06:26 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 794
Likes: 3
W
Member
They didn't bother to remove the old light fixture when they connected the romex cables in that ceiling? Was the light bulb socket in it still connected?

"I'm having roast rabbit for Easter dinner" [Linked Image]

#108547 04/01/04 09:14 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 391
B
Member
Quote
...Wouldn't the concealed junction boxes have been OK before the NEC was changed?
I don't know when 314.29 was written, but I don't think it was legal to bury boxes in the '70's, either.

All the work was open-frame and yet almost none of the cables were secured. Even where available none of the equipment grounds were properly bonded. It's not a code violation, but the conductors weren't twisted in those flying splices, leaving only the wire nuts to support the weight of the cables.

The husband admits to doing a lot of the work himself. Wife says they contracted some out to an "electrician". I'm hoping she's mistaken just because I hate the idea that there are people running around charging homeowners for installing this kind of mess. [Linked Image]

Wa2ise
No, no light bulb in that fixture. [Linked Image]

[And ignore my finger in the second picture... [Linked Image]]

-John

[This message has been edited by BigJohn (edited 04-01-2004).]

#108548 04/02/04 09:27 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 28
B
Member
Well you know what they say, out of site out of mind.

Neil

#108549 04/03/04 12:40 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,438
Member
Big John writes: "I don't know when 314.29 was written, but I don't think it was legal to bury boxes in the '70's, either."


From the lathe board & what looks like type "R" wiring... are you referring to the 1870's?

Randy


Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5