ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Safety at heights?
by HotLine1 - 04/23/24 02:17 PM
Old low volt E10 sockets - supplier or alternative
by gfretwell - 04/21/24 11:20 AM
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 231 guests, and 11 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#104477 03/05/03 08:39 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Member
See 300.11(B)

[Linked Image]

[This message has been edited by Joe Tedesco (edited 03-05-2003).]


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,527
B
Moderator
An old timer used to call these "eleven-year temporaries."

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,382
Likes: 7
Member
Joe:
That is "neat & workmanlike", but a very common NEC violation. Seems to me that "everyone used to", but now they know better.
John


John
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 552
T
Member
Just more of the "We bid it too low,hurry up and get it done" mentality that is so common in our trade.

Bjarney, LOL I like the "11 year temporary" explanation! [Linked Image]



[This message has been edited by txsparky (edited 03-05-2003).]


Donnie

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5