ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Safety at heights?
by gfretwell - 04/22/24 10:36 AM
Old low volt E10 sockets - supplier or alternative
by gfretwell - 04/21/24 11:20 AM
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 225 guests, and 10 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
#101087 02/22/07 07:57 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,213
S
Member
Maybe it's just a hang-up I have with the way some of the codes are worded, and a tendancy I have for trying to apply logic to a legal document. If I have a room that shares a common wall, it's treated one way, but if I double that wall up for extra fire safety and move it 12" away, all the sudden NEC wants me to treat it completely differently, which I think is BS- a room is a room whether it's sharing a wall or 30' away and should be treated the same way. I see outbuildings as merely extra rooms associated with the primary dwelling, maybe I'm wrong- as noted, this is not exactly my realm of expertise... But I see the shop as a dwelling sub-unit ("living") and see no logical reason it should be treated any different than a dwelling unit.


[This message has been edited by SteveFehr (edited 02-22-2007).]

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

#101088 02/22/07 02:30 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,930
Likes: 34
G
Member
Steve, it all has to do with diversity of the load. In a dwelling unit we put a lot of things in the load calculation that will not usually be going at the same time. Certainly with a house full of people on Thanksgiving with someone in the shower, washer/dryer going, every light in the house on and the stove/oven going on all burners that 310.15(B)(2) table is probably not going to be "enough" but most times it reflects the actual diversity a dwelling will have.
In the case of your garage/shop, you have usually overbuilt but the answer is just to protect your feeder with 310.16. If you are tripping that you probably underbuilt the feeder.


Greg Fretwell
#101089 02/27/07 11:38 PM
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 308
S
Member
Tom, you said the panel agrees it is only for feeders carrying 100% of the dwellings diversified loads. So what about a circuit to the garage? If you have a detached garage (with electric) the table won't apply?

I was thinking when you said shop, that maybe you meant a business of some sort. Of course if you are making kitchen cabinets in your garage and selling them, it is a business, right? Of course if you give the cabinets away then it's just a hobby.

I'll have to make sure our zoning officer checks the wiring before approving home based businesses.

Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5