Smackdown: 310 vs. 334

ECN Shout Chat

Give a Shout Out!

ShoutChat

Who's Online Now

1 members (Scott35), 396 guests, and 21 robots.

Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod

Print Thread

Rate Thread

Re: Smackdown: 310 vs. 334

#96293 11/18/05 07:56 AM

Joined: Jun 2004

Posts: 613

massachusetts

S

shortcircuit Offline

Member

I agree that 334.80 would apply and #2 copper NM has to be used.

But, in Massachusetts we have rewritten 334.80 and allow the 75 degree column to be used for NM not installed in thermal insulation , so #3 copper NM would be allowed.

shortcircuit

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:

>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Entire Thread
Subject	Posted By	Posted
Smackdown: 310 vs. 334	yaktx	11/18/05 03:37 AM
Re: Smackdown: 310 vs. 334	iwire	11/18/05 03:45 AM
Re: Smackdown: 310 vs. 334	yaktx	11/18/05 04:54 AM
Re: Smackdown: 310 vs. 334	shortcircuit	11/18/05 11:56 AM
Re: Smackdown: 310 vs. 334	markp	11/18/05 07:50 PM
Re: Smackdown: 310 vs. 334	Roger	11/18/05 08:06 PM
Re: Smackdown: 310 vs. 334	iwire	11/18/05 09:57 PM
Re: Smackdown: 310 vs. 334	yaktx	11/19/05 01:47 AM
Re: Smackdown: 310 vs. 334	iwire	11/19/05 02:00 AM
Re: Smackdown: 310 vs. 334	yaktx	11/19/05 02:54 AM
Re: Smackdown: 310 vs. 334	markp	11/19/05 02:55 AM