If there's an electrical danger or a better way to skin a cat, I don't want to wait 10 years to see it added to the Code.

Besides, as things change between the points of the proposed 10 year Code cycle, each jurisdiction will start adding their own little twists at shorter (Chicago used to do bi-monthly) time intervals until nobody has a CLUE what to do outside their own little town.
At least with a shorter Code cycle, there's a chance that there can be some uniformity.

Besides, one of the factors that influence insurance premiums in a town is how many Code cycles they are behind the current one. Lagging more than 2 cycles will hit the citizens of that town HARD for their insurance premiums. I can see the insurance folks requiring that each town immediately adopt the latest Code if the cycle is increased from the present 3 years.


Ghost307