>
I see where you're going here, a "Coil Blowover" situation!!! You are right about it being the blow over of something...
Actually, my messages to you were a series of carefully constructed questions to get you to back me up on the secondary having two waveforms of opposite polarity.
So when you say:
- H1 to X1 = 7320 VAC,
- H1 to X2 = 7080 VAC,
- X1 to X2 = 240 VAC,
you basically just showed that X1 has opposite polarity of H1 (the voltages add) and X2 has the same polarity as H1 (the voltages subtract), which I think means that you swapped X1 and X2 from how they are in the diagram. Shall we edit?
The only possible inference from this is that the waves of X1 and X2 are 180° apart.
(I am not ever trying to say that X1 lags or leads H1; X1's waveform is the simultaneously occurring property of an electromagnet, namely, the opposite pole).
[This message has been edited by Dspark (edited 07-10-2001).]
