Don:
I thought the same about the NECA publication too!
I wonder if that proposed new FPN will show up in all of the other areas throughout Chapters 6, 7, and 8 too?
All of the other 2005 NEC proposals that were in support of your concerns about 110.12 being "vague and unenforceable" were rejected, and only the NECA proposal above was accepted.
It is also "Vague and Unenforceable"!
The proposal for the new FPN should be reviewed by the public and comments are in order.
I agree with your 110.12 issues, and also agree that there are rules broken that are available to be cited by the AHJ.
[This message has been edited by Joe Tedesco (edited 04-25-2003).]
